Effects of adding low-dose esketamine to sufentanil and propofol sedation during cervical conization: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical conization is a brief but painful procedure that can be performed under sufficient sedation with propofol and opioids. However, this sedation approach comes with a high risk of sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs). Esketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, causes less cardiorespiratory depression than opioids. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adding a low dose of esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation as an opioid-reduced regimen. METHODS: A total of 122 consecutive patients with ASA I-II, body mass index < 30, and STOP-BANG score < 3 who underwent cervical conization were enrolled and randomly divided into Group S and Group ES. Using a closed-loop target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump with a target bispectral index (BIS) value of 60 ± 5, patients in Group S were sedated with 0.2 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol, while patients in Group ES were sedated with 0.15 mg·kg-1 esketamine, 0.1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and propofol. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of SRAEs, while the secondary outcomes included effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient and gynaecologist satisfaction. RESULTS: Data from 120 patients were analysed. The incidence of composite SRAEs was significantly higher in Group S than in Group ES (85.0% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the severity of SRAEs was higher in Group S than in Group ES (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of sedation, awakening time, psychotomimetic side effects, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or patient and gynaecologist satisfaction between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Adding low-dose esketamine to propofol and sufentanil sedation reduces the incidence and severity of SRAEs in patients undergoing cervical conization, with equal sedation efficacy, recovery quality, and no additional psychomimetic side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000040457 , 28/11/2020.

Electroencephalographic spectrogram-guided total intravenous anesthesia using dexmedetomidine and propofol prevents unnecessary anesthetic dosing during craniotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The bispectral index (BIS) may be unreliable to gauge anesthetic depth when dexmedetomidine is administered. By comparison, the electroencephalogram (EEG) spectrogram enables the visualization of the brain response during anesthesia and may prevent unnecessary anesthetic consumption. METHODS: This retrospective study included 140 adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy who received total intravenous anesthesia using a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusions. Patients were equally matched to the spectrogram group (maintaining the robust EEG alpha power during surgery) or the index group (maintaining the BIS score between 40 and 60 during surgery) based on the propensity score of age and surgical type. The primary outcome was the propofol dose. Secondary outcome was the postoperative neurological profile. RESULTS: Patients in the spectrogram group received significantly less propofol (1585 ± 581 vs. 2314 ± 810 mg, P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the spectrogram group exhibited delayed emergence (1.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.033). The postoperative delirium profile was similar between the groups (profile P = 0.227). Patients in the spectrogram group exhibited better in-hospital Barthel's index scores changes (admission state: 83.6 ± 27.6 vs. 91.6 ± 17.1; discharge state: 86.4 ± 24.3 vs. 85.1 ± 21.5; group-time interaction P = 0.008). However, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: EEG spectrogram-guided anesthesia prevents unnecessary anesthetic consumption during elective craniotomy. This may also prevent delayed emergence and improve postoperative Barthel index scores.

Bloqueo en el plano del músculo erector de la columna frente a anestesia local infiltrativa para discectomía endoscópica percutánea transforaminal: ensayo controlado aleatorizado prospectivo / Erector spine plane block versus local infiltration anaesthesia for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: Prospective randomise controlled trial

Antecedentes: Casi el 60-80% de la población padece de dolor de espalda, lo cual convierte a esta situación en una de las causas más comunes de consulta. Uno de los tratamientos más efectivos para el dolor lumbar es la discectomía endoscópica percutánea transforaminal, que requiere diferentes opciones anestésicas. Nuestro objetivo primario fue probar la hipótesis de si el bloqueo en el plano del músculo erector de la columna (ESP) bilateral con sedación es similar a la infiltración tradicional local de anestésico con sedación. Materiales y métodos: Se asignó aleatoriamente a cincuenta y dos pacientes sometidos a discectomía endoscópica percutánea transforaminal a dos grupos: el G1 recibió sedación intravenosa con anestesia local infiltrativa; G2 recibió sedación intravenosa con ESP bilateral. Resultado primario: cantidad de fentanilo y propofol durante la cirugía. Resultados secundarios: episodios adversos durante la sedación utilizando la herramienta de reporte sobre episodios adversos de la sedación de la Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia (SIVA), nivel de sedación postoperatoria utilizando la escala Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), intensidad del dolor tras la cirugía utilizando la escala visual analógica (EVA), umbral del dolor mecánico (MPT) utilizando microfilamentos de von Frey, medido en ambas extremidades inferiores, y satisfacción con la analgesia aplicando la escala Likert de 5 puntos. Resultados: La cantidad de fentanilo, propofol y el nivel de sedación postoperatoria fueron significativamente menores en G2 (p<0,001). No se produjo diferencia en cuanto a intensidad del dolor, satisfacción con la analgesia y umbral del dolor mecánico tras la cirugía en ambos grupos. No se produjeron episodios adversos en el grupo G2 en comparación con G1 (2 pacientes descriptores del riesgo mínimo, 5 descriptores del riesgo menor y 1 descriptor del riesgo centinela) que requirieron medicación adicional o ventilación de rescate...(AU)

Background: About 60% to 80% of the population suffers from back pain, making it one of the most common health complaints. One of an effective treatments of low back pain is transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (TPED) which requires different options for anaesthesia. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis if the bilateral erector spine plane block (ESP) with sedation is similar to traditional infiltrative local anaesthesia with sedation. Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients that underwent TPED were randomly assigned in two groups: G1 received intravenous sedation with infiltrative local anaesthesia; G2 received intravenous sedation with bilateral ESP. Primary outcome: amount of fentanyl and propofol during surgery. Secondary outcomes: adverse events during sedation employing World Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia (SIVA) adverse sedation event reporting tool, level of postoperative sedation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), intensity of pain after surgery engaging a visual analogue scale (EVA), the mechanical pain threshold (MPT) with von Frey monofilaments measured on both lower extremities, satisfaction with analgesia applying 5-point Likert scale. Results: Amount of fentanyl, propofol and level of postoperative sedation was significantly lower in G2 (p<0.001). There was no difference in intensity of pain, satisfaction with analgesia, and the mechanical pain threshold after surgery in both groups. There were no adverse events in G2 group in contradistinction to G1 (2 patients minimal risk descriptors, 5 minor risk descriptors and 1 sentinel risk descriptors) which required additional medication or rescue ventilation...(AU)

Effect of intravenous induction with different doses of Esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil on intraocular pressure among pediatric strabismus surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: It is well-established that maintaining stable intraocular pressure (IOP) within the normal range during ophthalmic surgery is important. Esketamine is a commonly used drug in pediatric general anesthesia due to its good analgesic and sedative effects. However, its application in ophthalmic surgery is limited because it can increase IOP. The effect of esketamine combined with other common anesthetics on IOP has been underinvestigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil on IOP during intravenous induction of general anesthesia for pediatric strabismus surgery. METHODS: A total of 181 children with strabismus undergoing unilateral eye surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Intravenous induction included the use of sufentanil 0.1 µg/kg, propofol 3 mg/kg, and esketamine. Base on the dosage of esketamine, the patients were randomly allocated into three groups: esketamine low (EL) group with 0.25 mg/kg (n = 62), esketamine high (EH) group with 0.5 mg/kg (n = 60), and normal saline (NS) group (n = 59). Hemodynamic parameters, respiratory parameters, and IOP of the non-surgical eye were recorded and compared among the three groups at different time points: before induction (T0), 1 min after induction but before laryngeal mask insertion (T1), immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (T2), and 2 min after laryngeal mask insertion (T3). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and respiratory parameters among the three groups at T0. The IOP at T1, T2, and T3 was lower than that at T0 in all three groups. The EH group (12.6 ± 1.6 mmHg) had a significantly higher IOP than the EL group (12.0 ± 1.6 mmHg) and the NS group (11.6 ± 1.7 mmHg) at T1. However, no difference was found between the EL and NS groups at any time point. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) at T1, T2, and T3 were lower than at baseline, and SBP and HR were higher at T2 than at T1. Additionally, the EH group had a significantly higher HR at T1 than the other two groups. There was no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) among the three groups at any time point. CONCLUSION: Propofol combined with sufentanil significantly decreased IOP during the induction of general anesthesia. Although a dose of 0.5 mg/kg esketamine elevated IOP compared to the low-dose and control groups after induction, the IOP remained lower than baseline. 0.25 mg/kg esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil had little effect on IOP. Therefore, we advocate that a maximum dose of 0.5 mg/kg esketamine combined with propofol and sufentanil will not elevate IOP compared to baseline in pediatric strabismus surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number is ChiCTR2200066586 at Chictr.org.cn. Registry on 09/12/2022.

Plasma cytokine levels in spinal surgery with sevoflurane or total intravenous propofol anesthesia - A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Surgical tissue trauma stimulates an inflammatory response resulting in increased levels of cytokines which could contribute to acute kidney injury (AKI). It is not clear if anesthetic modality affects this response. We aimed to investigate the role of anesthesia in a healthy surgical population on the inflammatory response and the correlation to plasma creatinine. This study is a post hoc analysis of a published randomized clinical trial. We analyzed plasma from patients who underwent elective spinal surgery randomized to either total intravenous propofol anesthesia (n = 12) or sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 10). The plasma samples were collected before anesthesia, during anesthesia, and 1 h after surgery. Plasma cytokine levels after surgery were analyzed for correlations with duration of surgical insult and change in plasma creatinine concentration. The cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) was increased after surgery compared with preoperatively. IL-6 was higher in the sevoflurane group than the propofol group after surgery. No patient developed AKI, but plasma creatinine was increased postoperatively in the sevoflurane group. There was a significant association between surgical time and plasma IL-6 postoperatively. No significant correlation between change in plasma creatinine and IL-6 was detected. The cytokines IL-4, IL-13, Eotaxin, Interferon γ-Induced Protein 10 (IP-10), Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1ß (MIP-1ß), and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 (MCP-1) were lower postoperatively than before surgery independent of anesthetic modality. This post hoc analysis revealed that plasma IL-6 was increased after surgery and more so in the sevoflurane group than the propofol group. Postoperative plasma IL-6 concentration was associated with surgical time.

Prospective, randomised comparison of two intravenous sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging in children.

BACKGROUND: Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years. METHODS: After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.

Recovery of driving skills after endoscopy under propofol sedation: a prospective pilot study to assess the driving skills after endoscopic sedation using driving simulation.

BACKGROUND: Patients are recommended not to drive for at least the first 24 h after endoscopy with propofol sedation. However, the evidence underlying these recommendations is scarce. We hypothesized that after endoscopic procedures performed under propofol sedation, the subject's driving ability was restored in less than 24 h. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled thirty patients between 20 and 70 years possessing a legitimate driver's license scheduled for endoscopy at our hospital. The sample chosen was a convenience sample. Gastroscopy or colonoscopy was performed with propofol sedation. Before and after endoscopy, the investigator drove the subjects to the laboratory to assess their driving skills using a driving simulation system, which employs 3 driving scenarios designed by professional transportation researchers. The blood propofol concentration was estimated before endoscopy, and 2 and 4 h after endoscopy. The primary outcome was the time required for subjects to recover their driving ability after propofol sedation. The secondary outcome was the blood propofol concentration before and after endoscopic procedures under propofol anesthesia. RESULTS: Thirty volunteers participated in the study and 18 of them completed all the interventions. In the low-risk S-curve scene, the mean acceleration, lane deviation, and number of deviations from the path at baseline (0.016 cm/s2, 42.50 cm, and 0.83, respectively) were significantly less than that at post-2 h (0.029 cm/s2, P = 0.001; 53.80 cm, P = 0.014; 2.06, P = 0.022). In the moderate-(overtaking) and high-risk (emergency collision avoidance) scenes, the tested parameters at baseline and post-2 h were statistically comparable. In the low-, moderate-, and high-risk scenes the tested parameters at baseline and post-4 h were statistically comparable. The total range of propofol was 120-280 mg.The mean blood concentration of propofol at post-2 h was 0.81 ± 0.40 µg/mL, and at post-4 h was below the limit of detection. CONCLUSION: After endoscopy performed under propofol sedation, subjects' driving abilities were completely restored at 4 h when tested on a simulator.

Effect of butorphanol on visceral pain in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Butorphanol slightly influences the respiratory and circulatory systems, has a better effect on relieving the discomfort caused by mechanical traction, and has a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Combined butorphanol and propofol may suppress postoperative visceral pain, which is avoidable in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Thus, we hypothesized that butorphanol could decrease the incidence of postoperative visceral pain in patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded trial. Patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to intravenously receive either butorphanol (Group I) or normal saline (Group II). The primary outcome was visceral pain after the procedure 10 min after recovery. The secondary outcomes included the rate of safety outcomes and adverse events. Postoperative visceral pain was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 1. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients were enrolled in the trial. Ultimately, 203 patients were randomly assigned to Group I (n = 102) or Group II (n = 101). In total, 194 patients were included in the analysis: 95 in Group I and 99 in Group II. The incidence of visceral pain at 10 min after recovery was found to be statistically lower with butorphanol than with the placebo (31.5% vs. 68.5%, respectively; RR: 2.738, 95% CI [1.409-5.319], P = 0.002), and the notable difference was in pain level or distribution of visceral pain (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The trial indicated that adding butorphanol to propofol results in a lower incidence of visceral pain after surgery without noticeable fluctuations in circulatory and respiratory functions for gastrointestinal endoscopy patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04477733 (PI: Ruquan Han; date of registration: 20/07/2020).

Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective in vitro study in which three vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol were individually inoculated with known concentrations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans (n = 36) to quantify bacterial and fungal growth was conducted. Over 120 hours, aliquots from contaminated vials were withdrawn, plated, and incubated to determine microbial concentrations. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate free bupivacaine concentrations over time in BLIS. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model with multiple comparisons. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twelve vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol. RESULTS: BLIS did not support significant growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans at any time. BLIS supported significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa beginning at the 24 hour time point. Bupivacaine 0.5% did not support significant growth of any organisms. Propofol supported significant growth of all organisms. Free bupivacaine concentrations changed minimally over time. CONCLUSION: Bacterial and fungal contaminant growth in artificially inoculated BLIS is organism dependent. BLIS supports significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Extra-label handling of BLIS should only be undertaken with caution and with adherence to strict aseptic technique.

Anestesia multimodal para ressecção de tumor cerebral com monitorização eletroneurofisiológica: relato de caso / Multimodal anesthesia for brain tumor resection with electroneurophysiological monitoring: case report

Introdução: O monitoramento neurofisiológico intraoperatório (MNIO) é uma técnica valiosa, empregada durante procedimentos neurocirúrgicos complexos. Ao monitorar continuamente as vias neurais, o MNIO fornece feedback em tempo real aos cirurgiões durante o procedimento, permitindo tomada de decisões críticas e redução do risco de déficits neurológicos. O papel do anestesiologista na identificação e correção dos fatores de risco modificáveis é fundamental para a prevenção de lesões neurológicas e otimização dos resultados. Sendo assim, a compreensão das limitações do MNIO e das evidências que orientam seu uso é de fundamental importância. Objetivo: Descrever o manejo de uma anestesia multimodal, realizada em conjunto com a equipe de neurofisiologia, para ressecção de um tumor cerebral recidivante e o seu desfecho clinico. Método: Trata-se de relato de caso atendido no Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo. Os dados para realização deste trabalho foram coletados durante a cirurgia, sendo a coleta autorizada pelo paciente por meio da assinatura de termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido. Relato do Caso: Paciente, sexo masculino, 64 anos, ASA II, hipertenso, com história prévia de meningioma atípico, submetido a neurocirurgia e radioterapia em 2021, em uso de anticonvulsivante oral para profilaxia de crises convulsivas. Apresenta lesão tumoral cerebral recidivante em região frontal bilateral. Após a indução anestésica, foi realizada passagem de acesso venoso central em veia jugular interna direita com auxílio de ultrassonografia, monitoração da pressão arterial invasiva após cateterização de artéria radial direita, sondagem vesical de demora, termômetro esofágico, otimização do posicionamento na mesa cirúrgica, índice bispectral e Scalp Block com 20 ml de ropicavaína a 0,375%. Realizou- se manutenção da anestesia com propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h) e remifentanil (0,1 mcg/kg/min) em infusão contínua associado a dexmedetomidina (0,2-0,6 mcg/kg/h) mantendo valores do índice bispectral entre 40-60. As respostas dos potenciais evocados foram obtidas nas extremidades superiores e inferiores durante todo o procedimento pela equipe de neurofisiologia. Durante a manipulação tumoral, foi detectada queda superior a 40% do potencial evocado motor em dimídio corporal esquerdo, e emitido o alerta à equipe cirúrgica. Nenhuma outra intercorrência foi registrada durante o procedimento. Conclusões: Propofol, dexmedetomidina, lidocaína, opioides e anestésicos voláteis potentes de baixa dosagem (menos de 0,5 CAM) associado a técnicas de bloqueios periféricos, fornecem condições compatíveis com monitoramento neurofisiológico intraoperatório. O MNIO contínuo é um complemento indispensável no período perioperatório para pacientes com alto risco de desenvolver complicações neurológicas. Os anestesistas devem fornecer um meio fisiológico e anestésico estável para facilitar a interpretação significativa das mudanças de sinal e precisa orientação cirúrgica. Palavras-chave: Adjuvantes Anestésicos. Potenciais Evocados. Neurocirurgia. Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória.

Analgosedación con propofol y fentanilo en las colonoscopia / Analgosedation with propofol and fentanyl in colonoscopy

Introducción: La comodidad durante la colonoscopia es una condición importante si se quiere que el paciente acepte procedimientos repetidos. Por lo tanto, se necesita de una buena sedación que pudiera combinar la analgesia con amnesia. Objetivo: Describir la utilidad de la analgosedación balanceada con propofol/fentanilo en colonoscopia ambulatoria. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo longitudinal prospectivo en pacientes a los que se les realizó colonoscopia de forma ambulatoria en el Hospital General Universitario Dr. Gustavo Aldereguía Lima en el período entre enero de 2017 y diciembre de 2018. Resultados: El 34,2 por ciento de los pacientes tenía entre 50 y 59 años, el 62,9 por ciento eran mujeres. El 73,3 por ciento de los pacientes se clasificó como ASA II según el estado físico. Los valores medios de frecuencia cardiaca y tensión arterial media tuvieron una disminución ligera después de aplicada la anestesia y se mantuvieron constantes en el resto de los momentos evaluados. Los valores medios de saturación de oxígeno de la hemoglobina se mantuvieron relativamente constantes en todos los momentos y resultaron algo superiores a la llegada del paciente a recuperación. La calidad de la sedación fue adecuada en 86,2 por ciento de los pacientes. La calidad de la analgesia y la recuperación fue buena en 88,4 por ciento y 96,2 por ciento , respectivamente. Se presentaron complicaciones en el 16,5 por ciento de los pacientes. Conclusiones: La analgosedación con propofol y fentanilo resultó una alternativa anestésica de utilidad en los pacientes a los que se les realizó colonoscopia ambulatoria con gran estabilidad hemodinámica en la serie estudiada(AU)

Introduction: Comfort during colonoscopy is an important condition if the patient is expected to accept repeated procedures. Therefore, good sedation that could combine analgesia with amnesia is needed. Objective: To describe the usefulness of balanced analgosedation with propofol/fentanyl in outpatient colonoscopy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive and observational study was carried out with patients who received outpatient colonoscopy at Dr. Gustavo Aldereguía Lima General University Hospital in the period between January 2017 and December 2018. Results: 34.2 percent of the patients were between 50 and 59 years old, while 62.9 percent were women. 73.3 percent of patients were classified as ASA II, according to their physical status. The mean values for heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure had a slight decrease after anesthesia was applied and remained constant for the rest of the evaluated times. The mean values of hemoglobin-oxygen saturation remained relatively constant at all the evaluated times and were slightly higher on the patient's arrival to recovery. The quality of sedation was adequate in 86.2 percent of the patients. The quality of analgesia and recovery was good in 88.4 percent and 96.2 percent, respectively. Complications occurred in 16.5 percent of the patients. Conclusions: Analgosedation with propofol and fentanyl proved to be a useful anesthetic alternative in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, with high hemodynamic stability in the studied series(AU)

Cardiopulmonary and propofol-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine in total intravenous anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on the propofol-based anesthesia of cats subjected to ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: Twenty-eight cats were randomly allocated to four groups (seven cats in each) and premedicated with either 5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (groups Dex 1, Dex 3 and Dex 5) or 0.05 ml saline (Prop group) intramuscularly. After the induction of anesthesia with propofol, total intravenous anesthesia was initiated with 300 µg/kg/min propofol plus 3 ml/kg/h NaCl 0.9% (Prop), or 200 µg/kg/min propofol plus dexmedetomidine at the rates of 1 µg/kg/h (Dex 1), 3 µg/kg/h (Dex 3) or 5 µg/kg/h (Dex 5). Cardiorespiratory variables were assessed 5 mins after induction and every 10 mins thereafter, until the end of anesthesia. The propofol infusion rate was adjusted every 10 mins (± 50 µg/kg/min) to maintain anesthetic depth. The times to extubation, sternal recumbency, ambulation and total recovery were recorded. Pain scoring was performed 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the end of anesthesia. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine produced a propofol-sparing effect of 72.8%, 71.1% and 74.6% in the Dex 1, Dex 3 and Dex 5 groups, respectively. Cats in the Prop group maintained higher heart rate values than the other groups, and the mean arterial pressure remained higher in the Dex 3 and Dex 5 groups. Rescue intraoperative analgesia (fentanyl bolus) was most frequent in the Prop group. There was no significant difference in the time of extubation. Cats in the Dex 1 and Dex 3 groups had a faster anesthetic recovery, with shorter times to achieving sternal recumbency, regaining ambulation and reaching full recovery. Cats in the Dex 1 and Dex 5 groups presented the best recovery quality scores, with 4 (range 4-5) and 4 (range 3-5), respectively, while the Prop group scored 1 (range 1-3), the worst anesthetic recovery score among the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of dexmedetomidine as a total intravenous anesthesia adjuvant, especially at doses of 1 and 3 µg/kg/h, reduces propofol consumption and improves cardiorespiratory stability and intraoperative analgesia, while promoting a better and quicker recovery from anesthesia.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Spinal Surgery in a Pregnant Patient: Case Report and Literature Review.

We report the strategy of anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in a 29-year-old, 22 weeks pregnant patient posted for surgery for aggressive vertebral body hemangioma. We used propofol and fentanyl-based anesthesia for IONM. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) were used to monitor the neural tracts during surgery. Fetal heart rate monitoring was done preoperatively and postoperatively. Train of 8, 75 µs duration pulse, 250-500 Hz stimulus was used for MEP and 30 mA, 200-400 µs, 3-5 Hz was used for SSEP. No new motor or somatosensory deficits appeared. Our findings suggest that IONM can be safely done in pregnant women.

Effects of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Etomidate has been advocated to be used in anesthesia for the elderly and the critically ill patients due to its faint effect on cardiovascular system. But the dose-dependent suppression of etomidate on adrenal cortex function leads to the limitation of its clinical application. Clinical research showed that dexmedetomidine could reduce the dose requirements for intravenous or inhalation anesthetics and opioids, and the hemodynamics was more stable during the operation. The objective was to observe the effect of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients. 180 elderly patients scheduled for elective ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were randomly allocated to PR group anesthetized with propofol-remifentanil, ER group anesthetized with etomidate-remifentanil, and ERD group anesthetized with dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate-remifentanil. Patients in each group whose operation time was less than or equal to 1 h were incorporated into short time surgery group (PR1 group, ER1 group and ERD1 group), and whose surgical procedure time was more than 1 h were incorporated into long time surgery group (PR2 group, ER2 group and ERD2 group). The primary outcome was the serum cortisol and ACTH concentration. The secondary outcomes were the values of SBP, DBP, HR and SpO2, the time of surgical procedure, the dosage of etomidate and remifentanil administered during surgery, the time to spontaneous respiration, recovery and extubation, and the duration of stay in the PACU. The Serum cortisol concentration was higher at t1~2 in ERD1 group compared to ER1 group (P < 0.05). The Serum cortisol concentration at t1~3 was higher in ERD2 group than in ER2 group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration was lower at t1~2 in ERD1 group compared to ER1 group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration at t1~3 was lower in ERD2 group compared to ER2 group (P < 0.05). The SBP at T1 and T3 were higher in ER2 and ERD2 group than in PR2 group (P < 0.05). The DBP in ER1 and ERD1 group were higher at T1 compared to PR1 group (P < 0.05). The dosage of etomidate was significantly lower in ERD1 group and ERD2 group than in ER1 group and ER2 group (P < 0.05), respectively. The administration of dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate can attenuate the inhibition of etomidate on adrenocortical function in elderly patients and maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability.

Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre la seguridad de la sedación para colonoscopias en pacientes ASA I y II realizada por enfermería y tutelada por anestesiología / Retrospective observational study on safety of sedation for colonoscopies in ASA I and II patients performed by a nurse and under the supervision of anesthesiology

Introducción: La sedación con propofol por no anestesiólogos es una práctica creciente en áreas fuera de quirófano resultado del incremento de procedimientos diagnóstico-terapéuticos mínimamente invasivos que precisan sedación y de la dificultad de los servicios de anestesiología para responder adecuadamente a esta demanda. Objetivo: El objetivo principal de este estudio es valorar la seguridad de un programa de sedación para colonoscopias administrada por enfermería formada y tutelada por anestesiólogos, aplicando un protocolo de sedación con sistemas Target Controlled Infusion. Material y métodos: Durante un periodo de 6 meses se incluyeron en el estudio todos los pacientes ASA I y II que precisaron la realización de una colonoscopia programada y cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Se realizaron 381 colonoscopias. En el procedimiento se analizaron los episodios de desaturación, hipo- o hipertensión, bradicardia o taquiarritmia y la necesidad de asistencia por anestesiología. Tras el procedimiento se evaluó en una escala de 1 a 5 el nivel de satisfacción y el dolor mediante escala verbal numérica de 0 a 10. Resultados: El 5% de los pacientes presentó una saturación de oxígeno menor del 90% sin requerir ventilación con máscara; el 7,35% presentó hipotensión, el 3,94% bradicardia y fue necesario consultar al anestesiólogo responsable en el 22% de los casos. El grado de satisfacción alcanzado por los pacientes al final del proceso fue de 4,27 sobre 5. Conclusión: La sedación durante colonoscopias, en pacientes ASA I y II, siguiendo un protocolo consensuado puede ser administrada de forma segura por personal de enfermería tutelado por anestesiología.(AU)

Introduction: Out of operating room sedation with propofol by non-anaesthesiologists (Non Anaesthesiologist Administration of Propofol) is a growing practice. This is due to the increase in minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring sedation, and the difficulty of anaesthesiology services to respond adequately to this demand. Objective: The main objective of this study is to assess the safety of a programme of nurse sedationist-administered target controlled infusion of propofol in colonoscopies supervised by anaesthesiologists. Material and methods: Over a period of 6 months, all ASA I and II patients who required colonoscopy and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A total of 381 colonoscopies were performed. Episodes of desaturation, hypo- or hypertension, bradycardia or tachyarrhythmia and the need for anaesthesiology assistance during sedation were analysed. After the procedure, patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale of 1 to 5, and pain was assessed on a numerical verbal scale of 1 to 5. Results: A small percentage (5%) of patients presented oxygen saturation of less than 90%, without requiring mask ventilation; 7.35% presented hypotension, 3.94% presented bradycardia, and the supervising anaesthesiologist was called in 22% of cases. Patient satisfaction at the end of the procedure was 4.27 out of 5. Conclusion: Sedation during colonoscopy in ASA I and II patients following an agreed protocol can be safely administered by nurse sedationists under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.(AU)

Lipofundin mediates major inhibition of intravenous propofol on phorbol myristate acetate and Escherichia coli-induced neutrophil extracellular traps.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) consist of chromatin DNA networks that are studded with cytosolic and granular antimicrobial proteins to trap or kill an infected microorganism. A lipid emulsion, the solvent of pure propofol for intravenous application, is given to clinical patients who require intravenous feeding of fatty acids and fat for energy. Intravenous propofol is widely used to sedate critically ill patients. Both intravenous propofol and its lipid emulsion have immunomodulatory activity. However, the role of lipid emulsion of intravenous propofol on NET induction remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, neutrophils were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the absence or presence of intravenous propofol (Propofol-Lipuro®), its solvent lipid emulsion (Lipofundin) or pure propofol, and NETs were stained with SYTOX Green for visualization and quantification. Total HOCl was determined by measuring the taurine-chloramine complex, and intracellular HOCl was evaluated with BioTracker™ TP-HOCl 1 dye. RESULTS: PMA-induced NETs were not efficiently inhibited when Propofol-Lipuro® was added after PMA stimulation. Clinically relevant concentrations of Lipofundin exerted a significant reduction in PMA-induced NETs and total reactive oxidative species (ROS), which was comparable to that observed for Propofol-Lipuro®. Lipofundin transiently reduced intracellular HOCl production and the phosphorylation level of extracellular regulated kinase (p-ERK) but did not scavenge HOCl. Moreover, Lipofundin decreased E. coli-induced NETs in a ROS-independent pathway, similar to Propofol-Lipuro®. CONCLUSIONS: All data agree that Lipofundin, the major component of Propofol-Lipuro®, inhibits intracellular HOCl and p-ERK to suppress PMA-induced NET formation but reduces E.coli-induced NETs in a ROS-independent pathway.

Propofol Anesthesia Depth Monitoring Based on Self-Attention and Residual Structure Convolutional Neural Network.

METHODS: We compare nine index values, select CNN+EEG, which has good correlation with BIS index, as an anesthesia state observation index to identify the parameters of the model, and establish a model based on self-attention and dual resistructure convolutional neural network. The data of 93 groups of patients were selected and randomly grouped into three parts: training set, validation set, and test set, and compared the best and worst results predicted by BIS. RESULT: The best result is that the model's accuracy of predicting BLS on the test set has an overall upward trend, eventually reaching more than 90%. The overall error shows a gradual decrease and eventually approaches zero. The worst result is that the model's accuracy of predicting BIS on the test set has an overall upward trend. The accuracy rate is relatively stable without major fluctuations, but the final accuracy rate is above 70%. CONCLUSION: The prediction of BIS indicators by the deep learning method CNN algorithm shows good results in statistics.

The effects of target-controlled infusion of lidocaine undergoing vocal cord polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial (CONSORT compliant).

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia-assisted target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine in patients with vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope. METHODS: In total, 80 patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy using a supporting laryngoscope were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group; each group contained 40 subjects: both groups received general anesthesia; subjects in the intervention also received an additional 3 mg/L of lidocaine by target-controlled plasma infusion during induction and maintenance of anesthesia; heart rate (HR) mean arterial pressure (MAP), propofol and urapidil consumption (Uradil, which is a blood pressure drug that blocks alpha-1, is called Urapidi Hydrochloride Injection. It is produced by Germany, the enterprise name is Nycomed Deutschland GmbH, the import drug registration number is H20090715, and it is widely used in China), recovery time, and cough score (measured by Minogue et al's 5-grade scoring method) during extubation, and throat pain score (measured by visual analogue scale,[VAS]) after extubation and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in HR (P < .05) and MAP (P < .05) immediately after intubation (T2), immediately after the operation starting to support laryngoscope exposure (T3), immediately after operation field adrenergic tampon hemostasis (T4), and 5 minutes after hemostasis (T5) between the 2 groups, and significant differences were also observed in HR (P < .05) before intubation (T1). Moreover, significant differences were observed in propofol consumption (P < .05), urapidil consumption (P < .05), cough score during extubation (P < .05), and throat pain score after extubation (P < .05). However, no significant difference was observed in the recovery time (P > .05). Furthermore, no adverse events were detected in either group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that target-controlled plasma infusion of lidocaine can reduce propofol consumption in patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy by supporting laryngoscopy, and the hemodynamics are more stable and reduce the coughing reaction in the wake period and throat pain after extubation without adverse events.

Intraoperative hand strength as an indicator of consciousness during awake craniotomy: a prospective, observational study.

Awake craniotomy enables mapping and monitoring of brain functions. For successful procedures, rapid awakening and the precise evaluation of consciousness are required. A prospective, observational study conducted to test whether intraoperative hand strength could be a sensitive indicator of consciousness during the awake phase of awake craniotomy. Twenty-three patients who underwent awake craniotomy were included. Subtle changes of the level of consciousness were assessed by the Japan Coma Scale (JCS). The associations of hand strength on the unaffected side with the predicted plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol, the bispectral index (BIS), and the JCS were analyzed. Hand strength relative to the preoperative maximum hand strength on the unaffected side showed significant correlations with the Cp of propofol (ρ = - 0.219, p = 0.007), the BIS (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.002), and the JCS (τ = - 0.508, p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for discriminating JCS 0-1 and JCS ≥ 2 demonstrated that the area under the curve was 0.76 for hand strength, 0.78 for Cp of propofol, and 0.66 for BIS. With a cutoff value of 75% for hand strength, the sensitivity was 0.76, and the specificity was 0.67. These data demonstrated that hand strength is a useful indicator for assessing the intraoperative level of consciousness during awake craniotomy.